-
당선무효 소송을 해야 한다!!!
수개표 청원 서명하러 가기
http://bbs3.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/petition/read?bbsId=P001&articleId=130388&objCate1=1&pageIndex=1
온라인 소송인단 참여하기 글입니다.
참가신청서와 설명이 있습니다.
http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?articleId=2234501&bbsId=D115&pageIndex=1
http://cafe.daum.net/electioncase/Eula/17
“박근혜 당선은 무효” 해외 동포 성명
승인 2012.12.29 16:58:41 
해외 동포들이 박근혜 18대 대통령 당선이 무효라는 내용의 성명서를 28일 발표했다.
블로그스팟에 공개된 게시물에 따르면 “자유롭고 공정한 선거는 민주주의 기반”이라며 “장애인 시설의 집단 대리투표와 선관위 디도스 사건 등으로 인해 선관위와 이명박정부의 신뢰가 심각하게 손상된 상황이고, 28일 기준 20여만명이 수개표를 위해 청원에 서명했다”고 전제했다.
이어 “공명선거를 염원하는 국민들의 정보공개 청구 이전에 선거관리위원회는 적극적으로 정보를 공개해야 하며, 지난 20년간 후보자별 지역별 성별 연령별 투표율과 득표율을 공개하여, 투표 바꿔치기와 같은 부정선거 의혹을 해소하라”고 주장했다.
또 “만약 거쳐야할 수개표 과정을 거치지 않은 것이 사실이라면, 박근혜는 아직 ‘당선인’ 아닌 ‘후보’로 불리워야 한다”며 “설사 개표가 완료된 것으로 간주한다 하더라도, 이렇게 많은 의혹들을 안고서는, 박근혜 당선인이 원하는 새 시대 새 정치의 문을 열 수 없을 것이다”고 주장했다.
엘라베마의 거주하는 황 아무개씨도 댓글을 통해 “박근혜 대통령 당선은 무효, 주권은 국민에게 있지 선거를 조작하는 사람들에게 있지 않다”고 주장하기도 했다.
▲ 성명서 전문 < 저작권자 © 프레스바이플 무단전재 및 재배포금지 >
이계덕 기자의 다른기사 보기 ★속보★ 미주동포 부정선거 성명서 발표/ 오마이뉴스 승인절차
10시간 전 조회 26361 댓글 430
img:not([src]) {display:inline-block;width:300px;height:300px;background:url(http://m1.daumcdn.net/icon/mobile/m320/tv/2010/loading.gif) no-repeat 50% 50%;}
미주의 유권자 및 해외동포들이 이번 대선의 부정선거 의혹에 관한 성명서를 발표했습니다.
현재 미주 각 지역의 사람사는 세상 단체들과 관심있는 모임에서 성명서 발표에 참여하였습니다.
이 성명서는 오마이뉴스에서 기사화되기 위한 승인을 기다리는 중이며 무한 펌이 가능합니다.
대한민국의 모든 언론이 12. 19 부정선거에 침묵으로 일관하는 상황에서 20만 명 이상의 시민들이
수개표를 청원하였고, 또한 아고라와 서프에서 이번 대선이 개표와 상관없이 미리 프로그램된대로 선관위가 발표하였다는 것을 증명하였습니다. 부정개표를 하였다는 것은 대선에서 문재인 후보가 앞섰다는 것을 저들이 알았기 때문입니다.
선거에서 이기고 대통령직을 도둑맞은 이 엄청난 상황에서 아까운 시간만 낭비하는 대한민국의 언론과
모든 지성인들은 크게 반성하고 온 세상에 부끄럽고도 어처구니없는 이 일을 속히 바로잡는데 모든 노력을 기울이기를 바랍니다.
http://2012skpreselection.blogspot.com/2012/12/sign-statement-for-transparency-of-18th.html
SIGN THE STATEMENT: For the Transparency of the 18th Presidential Election by South Korean Electors in the United States
<아래 글의 한국어 원문은 이 포스트 하단에서 읽으실 수 있습니다. 많은 해외 거주 유권자 여러분의 서명을 바랍니다. 서명을 하실 때에는 본문 밑의 코멘트 박스에 이름과 현재 거주 주소(도시와 주 혹은 국가)를 써주시고 원하시면 간략한 메시지를 남겨 주시면 됩니다. 여러분의 서명은 moderation을 거쳐서 포스트됩니다. 고맙습니다.>
just leave your name and address (city and state or country you live in) and/or brief messages in the comment box at the end of this post. Please note your comments will go through moderation before being posted here.>
A STATEMENT FOR THE TRANSPARENCY OF THE 18TH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
BY SOUTH KOREAN ELECTORS IN THE UNITED STATESFree and fair elections are the cornerstone of every democratic society. As fellow South Koreans and electors in the United States, we greatly appreciate the willingness of President-elect Geun-hye Park to integrate the nation by overcoming conflicts and divisions. We also hope that she will make the first step on this mission by listening to the half of South Koreans who were disappointed by the Lee government and thus wished for a regime change. We hereby sign this statement.As well-noted, there were quite a few issues with the general election on Apr 11th, 2012, including the distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack of the Election Administration Committee, the so-called tunnel DDos by Tae-ho Kim, voting by proxy in some facilities for the disabled, and so on. Although the Democrats raised these issues, there was no official investigation carried out by the Lee government, resulting in serious damage of the trust of South Koreans in the government and the Election Administration Committee. In this situation, a lot of questions have been raised regarding the presidential election as well, with as many as 200,000 people (as of the morning on Dec 28th) having signed in the petition for manual counting. As these problems signify a deep doubt about the legitimacy of the upcoming Park government, we request immediate action on the following items for the prevention of split in public opinion and for the stable start of the new regime.1. To guard and check the use of power of national institutions is a duty and also a right of the people, that is specified in the constitutional law, for which relevant information should be accessible and clear. In fact, Republic of Korea National Election Commission is supposed to be proactive in educating the public even before requests for adequate information. We ask that Republic of Korea National Election Commission present the data of elections for the past 20 years on the voter turnouts and the percentages votes earned per each candidate, region, gender, and age group, in order to resolve repeatedly raised suspicions of election rigging such as “flipped votes”.2. Republic of Korea National Election Commission has changed the voting stations without sufficient notice. It also has failed to provide adequate information about the reason for changing ballot box materials from metal to paper or plastic and about manual or electronic ballot counting process, although some questions were raised. As a measure to respect South Koreans’ right to know and also to preclude additional controversy in the future, Republic of Korea National Election Commission must account for these matters.3. In An-dong, a cluster of four ballots folded all together at once was found; not a bunch of four ballots which were separately-folded and then happened to sit on top of each other when being dropped in the ballot box. An explanation should be provided.4. It should also be clarified why different ballot envelopes were used in different precincts and why see-through envelopes were used, allowing a collector to be able to read the ballot inside.5. Analyses by statisticians and mathematicians should be run regarding the questions on the curves of voter turnout and the votes earned for Mr. Moon and Ms. Park measured over time.6. The record-high voting rate was 97% on Mar 15th, 1960, when the infamous fraudulent election was held. But people in 50’s were reported as the age group which marked 89.9% of voter turnout in this presidential election, which is considerably higher than other age groups. For verification, Republic of Korea National Election Commission should submit the register of the electors, on which who actually voted are marked.7. Conventionally, a former judge of the Supreme Court has been appointed and selected, having created some debate over his qualification, the chairperson of Republic of Korea National Election Commission. However, Neung-hwan Kim, the head of the organization at the time of the presidential election, was not a judge of the Supreme Court, having created some debate even before the election. In order to settle the charges, the public should be informed on why and how he was appointed.8. Besides, Public Official Election Act, article 107 was revised on Jun 25th, 2012, for an unclear reason about six months prior to the election, such that the preservation period of the materials of the presidential election, including the ballots, was shortened to one month. Justification for this revision should be presented.9. Electoral Fraud Act, Act No. 9147 did not even have the extinctive prescription, because the electoral transparency and reliability is the cornerstone of democracy. Nevertheless, to much regret, this law had been abolished in Dec 2008 by the Lee government. Considering that the question itself about the background of such abrogation gives rise to doubt in the trustworthiness of the government, we insist that Electoral Fraud Act, Act No. 9147 be revived, and all the suspicions including those on the 4.11 election, which were listed in the beginning of this statement, should be thoroughly inspected and resolved.10. Given unusually pre-valent doubts as to this presidential election, we request the consideration to keep all data and the ballots safe and sound even longer than the period specified in Public Official Election Act, article 107, if the Lee government and Miss. Park are confident in the fairness and accuracy of each process of the election. We would like to also plead that the preservation period to be extended by law amendment.In case the required manual counting has not been performed yet, Geun-hye Park is technically still a ‘candidate,’ not ‘President-elect.’ Even if the presidential election should be considered complete, all these questions and suspicions will become an obstacle for her mission of the new era and the new politics. Also, if she dismisses or suppresses people’s demand for manual counting or even re-counting, which is their constitutional right, her new government may face a serious resistance. If Miss. Park wants to be recognized as a democratic leader, especially in this time when the world is paying a close attention to South Korea concerned about the possible revival of dictatorship, we propose that she should respect this petition and execute all of the above demands.Dec XX, 2012
